Olaide

    Making speaking up at work worth it

    Employees kept speaking up, and nothing changed. I designed Fount, which turns every answer into a map of the employee journey, and a year later Fount AI, which tells HR what to fix first. Weekly participation averaged 81%, and Fount earned $3M+ in its first year.

    Role
    Senior product designerThe only designer. I led both products end to end.
    Team
    Head of Product, product team and engineersAcross both products
    Timeline
    5 months, then 3 monthsFount AI came about a year after Fount launched
    Status
    Shipped
    The Fount welcome screen on a soft pink and violet background: Welcome, Olaide, a short note on what Fount helps with, and two cards, Pulse Micro Surveys with a preview of a vacation policy question, and Data-Driven Dashboard with a preview of a team heatmap.

    Click any image to see it full size.

    At a glance

    1. The problem
      Employees gave feedback and never saw it change anything. Managers and HR had the data, but no clear way to turn it into decisions leadership would back.
    2. What I found
      The same four causes came up in every organisation: a trust gap, feedback fatigue, problems seen too late, and data that never became decisions.
    3. The ideaTurning point
      Turn feedback into a map of the employee journey, so anyone can see which moments matter most, and why.
    4. What shipped
      Fount: quick pulse surveys, and a journey dashboard that shows which moments to fix first, and why. A year later, Fount AI: a conversation that finds the main problems in employee comments, suggests fixes with their sources, and ranks them by return.
    5. Results
      81%
      weekly participation in micro-surveys
      63%
      of friction points with an action plan within 30 days
      6.2 → 1.4 wks
      from issue to resolution with Fount AI
      $3M+
      revenue in year one

    Feedback that went nowhere

    Companies collected feedback. Little of it turned into change.

    One of our customers had seen average employee turnover rise 28% in two years, and 65% of their exit interviews named “unaddressed workplace frustrations” as a reason for leaving. The feedback was there. It just never led anywhere.

    The problem looked different depending on who you asked:

    “I feel like my voice isn’t really heard, as I don’t see any changes in my department, even though I’ve given feedback and suggestions several times.”

    Software Engineer, mid-sized company

    “My team is struggling, and I don’t feel like I’m doing my best as a manager. I can’t turn their feedback into action plans, because I don’t know what’s causing the friction.”

    Team Lead, customer success

    “I’ve spent three months trying to get executive buy-in for our improvement plan, because I can’t show data on its impact.”

    HR Leader, manufacturing company

    Three people, one broken loop. Employees spoke up, managers couldn’t tell what to fix first, and HR couldn’t prove the value of fixing it. So nothing moved.

    What the research showed

    Listening across companies, roles and levels

    I led the research myself, starting at INGKA and then widening it to other industries:

    • 24 contextual interviews at INGKA across departments and seniority levels. I ran 14 of them.
    • 8 interviews at other organisations in tech, healthcare, finance and manufacturing.
    • 16 sessions with HR and leadership stakeholders, all facilitated by me.
    • A review of existing survey data and exit interviews, and a competitive analysis of the feedback tools on the market.

    Many complaints, four causes

    Cause 1
    A trust gap

    People didn’t believe honest feedback would lead to change, so they stopped giving it.

    Cause 2
    Feedback fatigue

    Long surveys, with nothing visible coming out of them.

    Cause 3
    Problems seen too late

    Managers only found out about issues once they were already critical.

    Cause 4
    Data, but no decisions

    HR had plenty of data but couldn’t turn it into clear priorities.

    Underneath it all

    Feedback was treated as a survey to run, not a loop to close. Nobody could see what happened after they spoke up.

    Three groups needed different things from the same loop. Employees wanted to be heard without extra work. Managers wanted to know what to fix first. HR partners wanted a clear story that drives decisions and proves impact.

    One loop to close

    Another survey tool wouldn’t fix this. People needed to see feedback the way employees experience work: as a journey of moments, each one good or bad for a reason.

    Turn feedback into a map of the employee journey, so anyone can see which moments matter most, and why.

    Four principles followed from that:

    Quick to give

    Giving feedback is quick, not a chore.

    See what matters most

    Managers see priorities, not raw data.

    Know why, not just what

    Every score breaks down into the people and things behind it.

    Impact you can prove

    Benchmarks and trends show leadership what changed.

    Choosing what to build first

    With Fount’s decision makers, I ran a prioritisation vote on what was most feasible, most valuable and most likely to bring in revenue at our stage. Then I ran an ideation workshop with stakeholders on the journey and flow for each group. Eight features made the first plan, and four waited for later, including an AI agent. Within that plan, version one shipped the core: quick pulse surveys, and a journey view that turns the answers into priorities.

    Planned first
    • Survey creation
    • Pulse surveys
    • Data and insights dashboard
    • Feedback analysis
    • Solution recommendations
    • ROI calculator
    • Roles and permissions
    • Integrations

    Shipped in version one. We shipped these first, and planned the rest to follow.

    Later
    • AI agent
    • Action tracker
    • Feedback portal
    • Performance management

    The AI agent came next. A year later, it became Fount AI.

    The outcome of the prioritisation vote: what we planned first, and what waited

    Act 1 · Fount: from feedback to a map of the journey

    Fount had two halves that worked as one loop. Managers and HR send short pulse surveys at the moments that matter, and every answer lands on a map of the employee journey, so anyone can see which moments are working, which aren’t, and why.

    Every new user lands on the same welcome screen. It shows both halves side by side, each with a preview of the real thing, so people know what they’re getting before they click.

    Welcome, Olaide: a short note on what Fount helps with and a View Docs button, then two cards. Pulse Micro Surveys shows a preview of a vacation policy question with a five-point mood scale. Data-Driven Dashboard shows a preview of a team heatmap split by gender, job code and location. Each card has a Get Started button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The welcome screen: where every new user starts

    1. Pulse surveys in minutes

    PrincipleQuick to give

    Get Started on surveys opens straight into templates, so the product starts with the thing that brings in data.

    Before

    One long annual survey, with results promised months later.

    An illustration of a long annual engagement survey: question 12 of 64, section 3 of 9, an estimated 35 to 45 minutes to complete, a grid of agree or disagree statements about the manager, and a note that results will be shared in Q3.
    An illustration of the old way, recreated for this case study.
    Now

    Short surveys built from templates, sent to the right people for a set time, and quick to answer on any device.

    1Creating a surveyClick a tab to follow the flow, and see the decisions behind each step
    Create your first survey: four templates, First day experience, AI tools adoption, Career advancement and Vacation policy, each showing a real question, with a Create from scratch button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Edit survey: the question How was your first day? as a required mood scale with five points, its options listed, and a live preview on the right. A second, optional text question sits below it with its own preview.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Survey settings: the survey name First Day Experience, a description, a start and end date and time, an Audience section with Create first audience, and a Launch survey button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Pulse surveys: two survey cards, First day experience and Engineering team collaboration, each with a short description of its purpose and a menu, and a New survey button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Start from a template: Where Get Started leads
    2What employees seeCheck the same survey on a phone and on a desktop
    The survey preview on a phone: First day at Fount, We are excited to hear how it went, a five-point mood scale wrapped onto two rows, a text box and a Submit your response button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The same survey preview in a desktop browser at getfount.com, with the five-point mood scale in one row, a text box and a Submit your response button.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    On a phone: The survey as employees see it on mobile

    2. The whole journey, at a glance

    PrincipleSee what matters most

    Answers are grouped into a journey, like Q4 new joiners, then into the moments inside it, like meeting the team or requesting time off.

    Before

    Feedback copied into spreadsheets by hand, themes guessed, and no way to tell which problem mattered most.

    An illustration of a team feedback spreadsheet called FINAL v3: feedback copied from surveys, one-to-ones, email and Slack, with themes typed by hand, duplicate rows, blank owners, an error cell and 214 more rows.
    An illustration of the old way, recreated for this case study.
    Now

    One overview of the journey, then a heatmap and a key driver chart that show which moments to fix first.

    1The overview
    The journey overview for Q4 new joiners: an NPS of 72, up 5, split into promoters, passives and detractors; key drivers ranked with high, mid and low impact; the top moments and the bottom touchpoints, each with a response count.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    2Finding the moments that matterClick a tab to see each view and the decisions behind it
    Insights in heatmap view: six moments as rows and fifteen job codes as columns, each cell a satisfaction score coloured from red to green, with Gender, Job code and Location filters.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Key driver analysis plotting each moment by impact against satisfaction, split into quadrants by dotted lines, with an NPS selector; below it, satisfaction for three moments over twelve months.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Insights in list view: each moment with its response count, impact, whether the impact is significant, CSAT score, difference and benchmark.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The moment selector open over the list view, showing Receive laptop, Meet team members, which is ticked, Learn about company and Complete onboarding forms.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Heatmap: Every moment, compared across teams

    3. Inside one moment

    PrincipleKnow why, not just what

    Each moment breaks down into touchpoints, the people and things that shape it, and attributes, what people actually felt.

    Before

    A slide with a chart and “further investigation needed”. Leadership saw what was low, but never why.

    An illustration of a leadership slide deck with an engagement chart by department pasted in from a survey tool. The recommendation says further investigation needed, and the speaker notes worry about not having turnover numbers.
    An illustration of the old way, recreated for this case study.
    Now

    Every moment shows its trend, the touchpoints and attributes behind it, how each compares to the benchmark, and the comments behind the numbers.

    1One moment, in depthClick a tab to see each view and the decisions behind it
    The Meet team members moment: a summary strip with a 61% score, up 9%, against a 52% benchmark and 2,500 responses, an Analyze feedback button, and satisfaction over time from January to July.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Touchpoints for the moment, such as your supervisor, senior leaders and your colleagues, and attributes, such as helpful conversations and enough feedback, each with response count, impact, significance, CSAT score, difference and benchmark.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The moment: Meet team members: its score and trend

    A year later: what was still slow

    Fount worked, and people used it. A year of real use also showed where the work was still slow. The feedback was coming in, but HR teams were drowning in it:

    Scattered
    5 to 8 platforms

    Employee feedback was spread across five to eight different tools.

    Stuck in analysis
    73% of HR leaders

    spent more time analysing data than acting on it.

    Too late
    6 weeks

    On average, that’s how long it took to spot an issue after it started.

    So I ran a second round of research over three weeks: 18 HR directors and VPs, 12 People Operations managers, 9 team leads and 4 C-suite executives.

    “I feel like I’m always putting out fires instead of preventing them. By the time we see patterns in our data, the damage is already done.”

    People Leader, manufacturing company

    That was a real need, and a business opportunity, so we built Fount AI.

    The journey, before and after Fount AISarah, a VP of People Operations, from spotting a problem to solving it. Switch between them with the tabs.
    Current-state journey map for Sarah, VP People Operations. Six stages over twelve weeks: trigger event, manual review, analysis, discussion, planning and implementation, each with its key frustrations, and an emotion curve that stays low throughout.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Future-state journey map for Sarah with Fount AI. Four stages over about two weeks: AI detection in real time, insights review on day 1, action planning on days 2 to 3 and implementation in weeks 1 to 2, each with its key benefits, and an emotion curve that stays positive.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Before Fount AI: twelve weeks from a problem to a fix

    Act 2 · Fount AI: a business partner for HR

    Fount AI finds friction early across different sources of feedback and recommends what to do next, backed by employee data and proven practice. Three strategic calls shaped it:

    Strategic call 1
    Help people decide, don’t decide for them.

    HR is accountable for its decisions, so full automation was the wrong tool. Fount AI asks before it acts, and its answers show the comments and sources behind them.

    Strategic call 2
    Answer “what should I do next?”

    People kept asking for next steps, not more charts. So Fount AI suggests fixes for each moment, then ranks them by return, so HR knows where to start.

    Strategic call 3
    Speed up the slow middle.

    The longest wait was between finding a problem and acting on it: working out which fix would pay off most, and preparing material leadership would trust. Fount AI does that work: it ranks the fixes by return and gives HR the reasons to take to leadership. Customers were also ready to pay thousands more for it in their enterprise deals.

    4. Ask Fount AI

    PrincipleA conversation, not another dashboard

    HR asks in plain words. Fount AI reads the comments behind the moments that matter most, names the main problems, and suggests what to do.

    Before

    HR checked six dashboards a day and pulled data into Excel to find patterns.

    An illustration of six separate tools, from a pulse survey tool and an HR attrition report to exit interview notes, with a merged spreadsheet on top full of mismatched department names and error cells.
    An illustration of the old way, recreated for this case study.
    Now

    Ask a question and get the main problems, the comments behind them, and fixes with their sources.

    1One conversationClick a tab to follow the conversation, and see the decisions behind each answer
    Fount AI: I have analysed 32 comments related to the top five moments. For the moment Take parental leave, three challenges, each with a count of supporting comments: inefficient approval process, inconsistent policies on extended leave, and lack of support with life changes. Below them, five solution recommendations.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Fount AI asks: would you like me to generate a list of solution recommendations for each moment, based on employee feedback and proven industry practice? The user says yes. After an Analyzing state, six recommendations for Take parental leave, followed by Resources linking to HR resources, Reddit and LinkedIn.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The problems: What employees are struggling with, and the proof

    5. What to fix first, and why

    PrincipleHelp people decide

    Knowing what to do isn’t enough when budgets are tight. HR has to know what to do first, and be able to defend it.

    Before

    Dashboards showed what was happening, but not what to do about it, or where to start.

    An illustration of a people analytics dashboard: falling engagement, sentiment by department, top themes, a dropping response rate and a high turnover risk score, with nothing that says what to do next.
    An illustration of the old way, recreated for this case study.
    Now

    For each moment, Fount AI picks the fix with the highest return, shows the hours and money it saves, and explains why.

    1The highest return first
    The user asks which recommendations have the highest ROI if done first, for each moment. Fount AI says Gotcha and shows Calculating. For Discuss career progression, the top fix is to set clear, measurable criteria for promotions, marked Highest ROI, with hours saved yearly and annual cost saved, and three supporting reasons.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The highest return first: the top fix for one moment, and why

    Tested with the people who’d use it

    I tested both products with the people they were for, at INGKA and beyond. The clearest request came in the AI round: customers wanted the biggest problems first, then the comments. That’s how Fount AI answers, starting with the top five moments.

    Fount
    18 + 9
    employees at INGKA, plus 9 participants from other organisations and our internal stakeholders
    Fount AI
    24 + 23
    people at INGKA, plus 23 participants from other organisations
    Usability testing, both productsFount’s dashboard in August 2023, then the AI features with customers. Switch between them with the tabs.
    Confluence page, Usability Testing, August 2023. The task: imagine you have survey data on the root causes of friction for call centre agents, and find two or three stories in the dashboard. The summary: users love seeing colours, great feedback on clarity, simplicity and tidiness, fewer pages, most didn’t realise there were benchmarks at all, and a decision to keep benchmarks as they are for now.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Assumption matrix in Confluence. The row Overview page: user gets a high-level grasp of the overall experience at the company and how it has changed over time. All five testers, Felix, Dan, Tom, Jill and Emilie, have a green tick, with notes such as we have colour, more intuitive to have promoters on the right, at which point does it flip from green to red, and explain what scores for engagement questions are.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Confluence page, Usability Testing AI Feature: a link to the Figma prototype and its second iteration, then the assumption matrix for customers and external users, prototype iteration 2. Testers: Alyssa from T-Mobile, Elise Dockery from a financial services firm, Michelle from UBS, Bobby from UHG and Carter from Discover. First row, basic navigation, look and feel: user can navigate to the new buttons, ticked for all five.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    The Fount AI assumption matrix. All five understood the Action recommendations button and the highlighted text. Most found highlighting useful, with requests to show insights within themes and single moments doing badly. On whether themes speed up free-text analysis: yes with export, yes, a request for the top 5 pain points and top 5 opportunities first then all comments, a data summary story, and a question about filters.
    Hover a decision to see it in the designTap a decision to see it in the design
    Fount: findings: the August 2023 write-up, with a real task and what we decided

    “It’s really great work. It’s beautiful too. It’s very clean… You’re not getting lost on the page.”

    Trish Delude, Customer Success Manager

    Feedback that finally led somewhere

    Most employees took part every week, and feedback turned into action. These were shared results. My part was designing a loop people trusted enough to use.

    How we measured: our customers reported these results while we ran sprints alongside them, helping their teams use the platform.

    Use stayed high: 91% of employees used Fount at least once a month, and 74% of managers checked their dashboard every week. We sold Fount AI on top of Fount, as an add-on for every enterprise customer, priced by contract.

    Fount AI, after 3 monthsMeasured with our customers after three months of use.
    Time from spotting an issue to resolving it77% faster
    Before
    6.2 weeks
    With Fount AI
    1.4 wks
    HR time spent analysing data, each week79% less
    Before
    14 hours
    With Fount AI
    3 hrs

    What people said

    Customer success worked closest with our clients, so their view mattered most.

    “I’m so excited with what you guys are building… I think the foundations are really, really robust.”

    Emilie Bastrup, Head of Customer Success
    Meeting transcript. Emilie Bastrup: It’s such a pleasure. I’m so excited with what you guys are building. Every time you come up with something, I can’t believe you’ve just knocked this up in a week. Massive kudos to you both. This is a journey and we’re going to have to iterate on it. And I think the foundations are really, really robust.
    Meeting transcript. Olaide Arike Kaffo: Awesome. Thank you so much. Trish Delude: It’s really great work. It’s beautiful too. It’s very clean. There’s one thing to do. You’re not getting lost on the page. It’s nice.
    From the meeting transcripts, unedited

    What this project shows about how I work

    I design the loop, not the survey.

    Four causes pointed to one idea: feedback has to visibly lead somewhere. Every feature closed part of that loop.

    Four causes
    I add AI where the data shows a need.

    A year of real use showed where the work was still slow. Fount AI was built for that, not because AI was in fashion.

    The turn
    I keep people accountable for decisions.

    The AI shows its evidence and asks before it acts. People make the call.

    Strategic calls
    I listen across every level.

    Two rounds of remote research, one for each product, with employees, managers, HR and leadership.

    The research

    Where the work goes next

    From the roadmap I proposed, based on ongoing feedback and usage data:

    • The features that waited in the first vote: an action tracker, a feedback portal and performance management.
    • Industry modules for industries with high friction, such as manufacturing.
    • Integrations with performance management and learning platforms.
    • Enterprise single sign-on for complex security requirements.

    The goal behind all of it: nobody should ever wonder whether speaking up was worth it.